You are using an outdated browser. Upgrade your browser today for a better experience of this site and many others.
Northampton: 01604 630745
Rugby: 01788 575037
Investment in property continues to be a popular form of investment. On the basis that the investment appears to make commercial sense what tax factors should you take into account?
On the basis that the investment in property appears to make commercial sense what tax factors should you take into account? If you are considering property investment in the Northampton and Rugby area we, at J R Watson & Co Accountants, can help you to make property investments in a tax efficient manner.
Investment in property has been and continues to be a popular form of investment for many people. It is seen as a route by which:
Of course, the net returns in capital and income will depend on a host of factors. But on the basis that the investment appears to make commercial sense, what tax factors should you take into account?
An initial decision needs to be made whether to purchase the property:
There are significant differences in the tax effects of ownership by individuals or a company.
Deciding on the best medium will depend on a number of factors.
The personal purchase of new offices or other buildings and the charging of rent for the use of the buildings to your company is very tax efficient from an income tax position as:
Capital gains on the disposal of an asset are generally calculated by deducting the cost of the asset from the proceeds on disposal and reducing this by the annual exemption. Gains are treated as an individual’s top slice of income and are generally taxed at 10% and 20% or a combination of the two. However gains on residential property are charged at 18% and 28%.
Unfortunately ER is unlikely to be available on the disposal of business premises used by your company where rent is paid. This is due to the restrictions on obtaining the relief on what is known as an “associated disposal”. These restrictions include the common situation where a property is currently in personal ownership, but is used in an unquoted company or partnership trade in return for a rent. Under the ER provisions such relief is restricted where rent is paid.
The decision as to who should own a residential property to let is a balancing act depending on overall financial objectives.
The answer will be dependent on the following factors:
If you already run your business through a company it may be more tax efficient to own the property personally as you will be able to make use of your CGT annual exemption (and your spouse's annual exemption if jointly owned) on eventual disposal to reduce the gain.
In contrast, a company may still be able to use an indexation allowance to reduce a capital gain. This effectively uplifts the cost of the property by the increase in the Retail Price Index (RPI) over the period of ownership up until December 2017 when indexation allowances were frozen, irrespective of the date of disposal of the asset.
Indexation is not available to reduce the gain on the disposal by an individual so in situations where indexation allowance is substantial, this could result in lower gains.
For personally-owned property the net rental income will be taxed at your marginal rate of tax, but if you are financing the purchase with a high percentage of bank finance, the income tax bill will be relatively small. However for rented property with personal ownership the deduction for finance costs is restricted to basic rate relief from April 2017. This restriction is to be phased in over a four year period and will impact higher and additional rate taxpayers.
The net rental income will be taxed at the current corporation tax rate of 19%, reducing to 17% from 1 April 2020, which is generally lower than the income tax rates for an individual. Where the purchase is being financed with a high percentage of loan/bank finance, the corporation tax bill will be relatively small.
But there are other factors to consider:
Personal or joint ownership may be the more appropriate route but there are currently other significant advantages of corporate status particularly if you expect that:
If so, the use of a company as a tax shelter for the net rental income can be attractive.
Profits will be taxed at the current corporation tax rate of 19%. This rate applies to trading companies or property investment companies.
Where profits are retained, the income may be suffering around half of the equivalent income tax bills. That means there are more funds available to buy more properties in the future.
There are two potential long-term advantages of the corporate route for residential property:
A potentially attractive route is to consider the property investment company as a 'retirement fund'. If the properties are retained into retirement, it is likely that any initial financing of the purchases of the property has been paid off and there will be a strong income stream. The profits of the company (after paying corporation tax) can be paid out to you and/or your spouse as shareholders.
Where the profits are taken by way of dividend:
CGT will be due on the gain on the eventual sale of the shares.
The share route may also be more attractive to the purchaser of the properties rather than buying the properties directly, as they will only have 0.5% stamp duty to pay rather than the potentially higher sums of Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) on the property purchases.
SDLT is payable by the purchaser of the property in England and Northern Ireland. Land and Buildings Transaction Tax is payable in Scotland and Land Transaction Tax is payable in Wales.
Where expensive residential property, valued at more than £500,000, is purchased by a 'non natural person', broadly a company, there is a potential charge - the Annual Tax on Enveloped Dwellings (ATED). The ATED is payable by those purchasing and holding their homes through corporate envelopes, such as companies. In addition a higher rate of SDLT of 15% applies to the purchase.
There are exemptions from the higher rate of SDLT and the ATED charge; in particular, property companies letting out residential properties to third parties.
CGT is charged at 28% on disposals of properties liable to ATED and valued at more than £500,000.
This factsheet has concentrated on potentially long-term tax factors to bear in mind with property investment.
You need to decide which is the best route to fit in with your objectives. At J R Watson & Co Accountants, we can help you to plan an appropriate course of action for your property investment in the Northampton and Rugby area.
04 Dec 2019
Some employers may wish to give a small gift to their employees.
New company car advisory fuel rates have been published which took effect from 1 December 2019.
HMRC is giving information to taxpayers to help them avoid scams ahead of the Self Assessment deadline.
Would you like to download our mobile app from the App Store?